MS SIGMA SPICE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND 7 ORS
WP(C)/4178/2026 · 2026-08-13
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12651 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12651 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No. 1/3 GAHC010151992026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4178/2026 MS SIGMA SPICE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, REGISTERED OFFICE AT MALPANI COMPLEX, AT ROAD, KENDUGURI, JORHAT, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE AND HAVING CIN NO. U15490AS2010PTC009888 VERSUS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND 7 ORS CORPORATE OFFICE AT CHANDERMUKHI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA CHANDERMUKHI NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI 400021 3:THE REGIONAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA J B COLLEGE ROAD BARUAH CHARIALI P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST JORHAT ASSAM 4:THE ZONAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONAL OFFICE 2ND FLOOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA BUILDING GS ROAD SHAKTIGARH PATH NEAR SENCO JEWELLERS BHANGAGARH
Page No. 2/3 GHY ASSAM PIN 781005 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA JORHAT BRANCH J B COLLEGE ROAD BARUAH CHARIALI P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST JORHAT ASSAM 6:SMTI RANJANA BHARATI BRANCH MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA J.B COLLEGE ROAD BARUAH CHARIALI P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST JORHAT ASSAM JORHAT BRANCH ASSAM 7:RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR PAN BAZAAR MAWHATI STATION ROAD GHY ASSAM 781001 8:THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN OFFICE OF THE INTEGRATED OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA PAN BAZAAR MAWHATI STATION ROAD GHY ASSAM 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SAHEWALLA, MR. W SHARMA,MR P GOGOI,S SENGUPTA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No. 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 14.08.2026
Mr. A.K. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition as certain defects have crept in in the writ petition, with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent Bank authorities who is in attendance, has submitted that he has no objection to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant