[2026:JHHC:14486] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.771 of 2026 ------ 1. Vijay Yadav @ Bikram Jee aged about 29 years son of Bigan Yadav resident of village – Kuriyam Khurd P.O.- and Police Station – Balumath, District- Latehar. 2. Dhurv Ram @ Dhurv Jee @ Guardian @ Raju Ram aged about 48 years son of Dukhan Ram resident of village Hotai, P.O. and police station- Panki District- Palamau .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.06 Dated-12-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 (2) (B), 308(6), 308(7), 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, under Section 25 (1-A) of the Arms Act and under Section 17 of C.LA. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners claiming to be the members of J.J.M.P.- extremist organization beaten the labourer of the brick kiln with the butt of their weapons, stopped work at the brick kiln, demanded levy for running the brick kiln and threatened him to kill if levy is not paid. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting them on Test Identification Parade, as mentioned in para-09 of the Supplementary Affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is then submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.12.2025 passed in B.A. No.10719 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 31.10.2025 as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Latehar in connection with Barwadih P.S. Case No.18 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-12.05.2026-Animesh/