- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8565 WP No. 9784 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 9784 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. D. S. GOWRI ALIAS D. S. RAMYA W/O. SRI R. RAMESH D/O. LATE D. N. SOMASUNDARA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.32, 6 A CROSS 4TH MAIN ROAD BRINDAVAN EXTENSION (BEHIND MAHVEER SCHOOL) MYSURU - 570 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GURUDATH B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. UMA W/O. SEASSHDRI A. S. AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT NO.130 VSCS SATAGALLI LAYOUT VIDYASHANKARA NAGARA MYSURU CITY - 570 019. 2. SRI D. S. ANAND S/O. LATE D. N. SOMASUNDARA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.303 SRI SAI LEELA APARTMENTS RAJARESHWARI NAGAR HOSAKERALLI BANGALORE - 560 098. 3. SMT. B. MANJULA Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8565 WP No. 9784 of 2025 W/O. D. S. SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 4. SRI D. S. BHARAT RAHUL S/O. LATE D. S. SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 5. SMT. D. S. BHUVANESHWARI S/O. LATE D. S. SUBRAMANYA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. RES. 3 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.107 "THIRUMARAGADARSHI ENCLAVE", HBR LAYOUT 19TH MAIN ROAD 38TH CROSS, 5TH PHASE (NEAR MANYA TECH PARK) BANGALORE - 560 043. 6. SMT. R. RAJESHWARI W/O. LATE D. S. CHANDRAMOULI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 7. SRI D. C. VAGESH S/O. LATE D. S. CHANDRAMOULI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESPONDENT 6 AND 7 ARE R/AT D. NO.1155, 5TH MAIN A. B. BLOCK 2ND STAGE RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE - 560 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED. 18.02.2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.599/2019 BY III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT MYSURU ON I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 READ WITH SECTION 151 CPC VIDE ANNEXURE-F BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8565 WP No. 9784 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of petitioner. 2. The matter is listed for compliance of office objections for seventh time. 3. There was no representation on the last occasion. On the previous date i.e. on 12.12.2025, this Court has passed the following order: "Despite granting six adjournments to rectify the objections raised by the registry, the same is not done. Another week's time is granted to do the needful. if rectification is not done, re-list this matter for dismissal." 4. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8565 WP No. 9784 of 2025 Under the circumstances, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11