Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12638 (BOM)

Mahendra Kisan Pasalkar v. Anita Ramesh Padale

IA/3403/2026 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

40-IA-3403-26 IN REVN-330-2026 (Withdrawal).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3403 OF 2026 IN REVN/330/2026 Mahendra Kishan Pasalkar ...Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Anita Ramesh Padale ...Applicant VERSUS Mahendra Kishan Pasalkar & Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr.Hemant Ghadigaonkar a/w Mr.Om Gandhi, for the Applicant. Mr.Dattatray Yadav i/b Mr.R.S. Gangawane, for Respondent No.1. Ms.R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent No.2-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : . Not on board. Taken on board. 2. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking withdrawal of Rs.15,40,000/- deposited by the Respondent No.1-Accused. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, Respondent No.1 and learned APP for Respondent No.2-State. 4. The learned counsel for Respondent No.1 has strongly objected to allow the Application stating that the Respondent No.1 has good case and he has challenged the order passed Court below. 5. I have heard both learned counsel. NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.09.30 18:27:47 +0530 40-IA-3403-26 IN REVN-330-2026 (Withdrawal).doc N.S.Kamble 6. The Applicant is Complainant. The Respondent No.1 is accused. He has deposited the amount. The Courts below has passed order against the Respondent No.1. 7. Considering this fact, I pass following order. ORDER (i) The Application is allowed. (ii) The Applicant is permitted to withdraw Rs.15,40,000/- deposited by Respondent No.1 alongwith interest, if any, with an undertaking that he will deposit the amount, if required. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)