Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12627 (BOM)

Abdul Samee Siddiqui v. Ashfaq H Mansoori

IA/14/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

37-IA-14-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2026 IN REVN/451/2026 Abdul Samee Siddiqui ...Applicant/s VERSUS Ashfaq H Mansoori ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Ashutosh Gaikwad (thr. VC),Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Aamir A. Qureshi a/w. Vinayak R. Garje, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and Respondent No1 and learned APP. 2. By this Application, the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the amount deposited by the Respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent strongly objected for withdrawal of the amount. 4. I have heard both learned counsel. Applicant is the complainant. The Courts below convicted the Respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Respondent has deposited the cheque amount of Rs.6,42,872/- to show his bonafide. VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.09.30 10:37:43 +0530 37-IA-14-2026 (CR).doc Tikam 5. Considering this fact, I pass following order: ORDER (i) Interim Application is allowed. (ii) The Applicant is permitted to withdraw the deposited amount along with accrued interest, if any. (iii) The Applicant undertakes to redeposit the said amount, if required. (iv) Interim Application is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)