Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010135622026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2287/2026 NARAYAN GHOSH AND ANR S/O LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH, RESIDENT OF A.T. ROAD, C/O NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS, P.O. PANBAZAR, P.S.- PALTANBAZAR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN.- 781001 2: SMT ITI GHOSH D/O LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH RESIDENT OF A.T. ROAD C/O NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS P.O.- PANBAZAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR DIST KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 78100 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF ASHA ROUT, HER LEGAL HEIRS, NARAYAN ROUT AND 4 ORS. RESIDENT OF KALASHANI APARTMENT, FLAT NO. 1 H, SOLAPARA ROAD, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI, P.O. AND P.S.- PALTANBAZAR, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781008 2:SANJAY ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT RESIDENT OF KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O. AND P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781008 Page No.# 2/5 3:SANJIMA LAL D/O SRI NARAYAN ROUT RESIDENT OF KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O. AND P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781008 4:SAROJ ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT RESIDENT OF KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O. AND P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 781008 5:SMTI SUDHA ROUT D/O SRI NARAYAN ROUT RESIDENT OF KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O. AND P.S.- PALTANBAZAR DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN- 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD B ISLAM, D J BASUMATARY,MR S HUSSAIN,MR. A A MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : R C SANCHATI(R1TO5), MR. A SANCHETI(R1TO5) Linked Case : RSA/7761/2026 Page No.# 3/5 NARAYAN GHOSH S/O- LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH RESIDENT OF - A.T. ROAD C/O. NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS P.O. PANBAZAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR DIST KAMRUP MASSAM PIN.- 781001 2: SMT ITI GHOSH D/O- LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH RESIDENT OF - A.T. ROAD C/O. NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS P.O. PANBAZAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR DIST KAMRUP MASSAM PIN.- 781001 VERSUS SMTI ASHA ROUT W/O.SRI NARAYAN ROUT RESIDENT OF -KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O.- P.S. PALTANBAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN.- 781008 2:ON THE DEATH OF ASHA ROUT HER LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTATIVES AS FOLLOWS SRI NARAYAN ROUT SON OF UNKNOWN 3:SANJAY ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT 4:SANJIMA LAL D/O. SRI NARAYAN ROUT 5:SRI SAROJ ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT 6:SMTI SUDHA ROUT D/O. SRI NARAYAN ROUT ALL ARE RESIDENT OF -KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O.- P.S. PALTANBAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN.- 781008 ------------ Advocate for : SHAHAB UDDIN Advocate for : appearing for SMTI ASHA ROUT Page No.# 4/5 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/7763/2026 NARAYAN GHOSH S/O- LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH RESIDENT OF - A.T. ROAD C/O. NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS P.O. PANBAZAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR DIST KAMRUP MASSAM PIN.- 781001 2: SMT ITI GHOSH D/O- LATE JASHODALAL GHOSH RESIDENT OF - A.T. ROAD C/O. NARAYAN BAKERY OPPOSITE SARAB MOTORS P.O. PANBAZAR P.S- PALTANBAZAR DIST KAMRUP MASSAM PIN.- 781001 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF ASHA ROUT HER LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTATIVES AS FOLLOWS SRI NARAYAN ROUT SON OF -UNKNOWN 2:SANJAY ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT 3:SANJIMA LAL D/O. SRI NARAYAN ROUT 4:SRI SAROJ ROUT SON OF SRI NARAYAN ROUT 5:SMTI SUDHA ROUT D/O. SRI NARAYAN ROUT AIL ARE RESIDENT OF -KALASHANI APARTMENT FLAT NO. 1 H SOLAPARA ROAD PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI P.O.- P.S. PALTANBAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN.- 781008 ------------ Advocate for : SHAHAB UDDIN Advocate for : appearing for ON THE DEATH OF ASHA ROUT HER LEGAL HEIRS REPRESENTATIVES AS FOLLOWS SRI NARAYAN ROUT Page No.# 5/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 19.08.2026 Heard Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. R.C. Sanchati, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, praying for considering the condonation of the delay of 6 years 9 month 15 days in preferring the Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. 3. The appellants/petitioners were the defendants in the suit before the learned Trial Court. A decree was passed against them, whereafter they preferred an appeal, and which was also dismissed. 4. According to Mr. R.C. Sanchati, learned counsel for the respondents, the decree has already been satisfied in execution. 5. Mr. B. Islam, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, has submitted that the delay occurred due to the fault of the learned counsel. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. This Court is of the opinion that the extraordinary delay has not been satisfactorily explained. Therefore, this Court refuses to condone the delay. 7. Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant