(2026:JHHC:14458) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.312 of 2026 ------ Aurangzeb Khan, aged about 48 years, S/o- Late Akbar Khan, R/o- Flat No. D/2, Danish Apartment, Dhatakidih, P.O. & P.S.- Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shahbaz Arif D/o Sarjad Arif R/o- H. No. 28D, Road No.-6, Jakir Nagar, Old Purulia Road, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Dist- East Singhbhum .... .... .... Opposite Parties. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Devesh Ajmani, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated- 11-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 3(5) of the B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the brief facts of the case are that the informant entered into an agreement with the co- accused, but the said development agreement was cancelled. The informant paid further amount to the co-accused namely Mohammad Naism Sheikh. It is next submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is of purchasing an apartment and Mohammad Naism Sheikh embezzled Rs. 18,50,000/- from the informant. It is further submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner and the co-accused namely Sajjad Ali is that, they introduced the informant to Mohammad Naism Sheikh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the co-accused person namely Sajjad Ali has been admitted to bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 in B.A. No.1881 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in para-28 and he has been in custody since 04.12.2025 as mentioned in para-29 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11/05/2026 Amar/