HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16450 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no. 2, Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Meerut, and the other competent respondents to process and decide the petitioner's medical reimbursement claim bearing Application No. MER0417979 in accordance with the applicable rules and Government Orders and also direct the the respondents to sanction and release the admissible medical reimbursement amount out of Rs.58,826/-, after due verification of the supporting documents. ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the the respondent no.4 to pass an appropriate on the representation of the petitioner dated 21.8.2026 (Annexure No.4) expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 and 4 and the learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents No. 1 and 3 have contended that the grievance of the present petitioner raised in the instant writ petition can be more appropriately redressed by the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), and they have no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mushir Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Srivastava Mariyam Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Municipal Commissioner (respondent No. 2), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. October 7, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 16450 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad