1 2026:CGHC:21152 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 430 of 2026 1 - Sumita @ Suneeta W/o- Late Brijbhan Singh, Aged About 36 Years R/o- Nepal Gate, House No. 407 Charcha Colliery, P.S. Charcha, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) (The Name Of Applicant No.1 Is Recorded As Suneeta In Service Record Of Her Husband) 2 - Santosh Singh, S/o Late Brijbhan Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o Nepal Gate, House No. 407 Charcha Colliery, P.S. Charcha, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.) 3 - Meena Singh D/o Late Brijbhan Singh Aged About 31 Years W/o Dharmendra Singh, R/o Kailashpur, P.S. And Tehsil Sonhat, Distt. Koriya C.G. ... Applicants versus 1 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Department Of Mines, 3rd Floor, A Wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi 110001 2 - General Manager (Mining)/ Deputy Regional Manager Secl, Charcha Mine (Ro) Post Charcha Colliery, Distt. Koriya C.G 3 - Chairman Cum Managing Director, Secl Headquarter Sipat Road Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Senior Manager (Personnel) Secl, Charcha Mine, (Ro) Post Charcha Colliery, Distt. Koriya C.G. ... Respondent(s) 2 For Applicants : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 06/05/2026 1. This Miscellaneous Civil Case has been filed by the applicants praying for extension of time granted by this Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 in WPS No. 13499 of 2025 wherein this Court has granted 45 days to the petitioners therein from the date of receipt of copy of order and also directed that neither the Conciliation authority nor respondents will take plea of limitation and in turn they will consider and decide the dispute on its own merit, in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the order dated 02.12.2025 passed by this Court in WPS No. 13499 of 2025 the applicants submitted online dispute in the samadhan.labour.gov.in.portal bearing application no. 300168167 submitted to RLC (C) and the same was sent for clarification and after clarification, the application of applicants was rejected due to some technical reason. Meanwhile the time of 45 days granted by this Hon’ble Court has been lapsed. He, therefore prays for extension of time. 3. Counsel for the Union of India would submit that the applicants 3 have failed to comply the order of this Hon’ble Court within the given time frame. Therefore, the present MCC deserves to be dismissed. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 5. Considering the order passed by this Court in WPS No. 13499/2025, this Court directed the applicants to raise industrial dispute before appropriate forum within a period of 45 days but the same could not be complied by the applicants within the given time frame. Therefore, it is directed that the applicants may raise dispute before the Conciliation authority within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in turn the respondents shall consider and decide the dispute on its own merits. 6. Accordingly, the present Miscellaneous Civil Case stands allowed. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Madhurima