Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12609 (KAR)

SRI RAMACHANDRA M v. SRI VIKRAM HEGDE

CRL.RP/1008/2022 · 2026-03-18

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15793 CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI RAMACHANDRA M., S/O SRI MAHABALA M., AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/A MEBAIL, SHANKARANARAYANA POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, PRESENTLY R/A APC 1568, DAR HEAD QUARTERS, CHANDU MAIDAN, UDUPI - 576 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASANNA V R., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI VIKRAM HEGDE, S/O SRI BHUJANGA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A KERJADI MANE ALBADI VILLAGE, ARDI POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 212. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRASANNA K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.07.2022 IN CRL.A.NO.47/2020 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI (ITINERARY SITTING AT KARKALA) AND ORDER DATED 12.06.2020 IN C.C.NO.1697/2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT KARKALA AND ETC., Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15793 CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2022 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Joint memo is filed. Memo reads as under: "JOINT MEMO The Petitioner/Accused and Respondent /Complainant respectfully submits that the Petitioner undertakes to pay the balance of 50% of the fine amount within three months to the Respondent/Complainant by depositing the same in CC.No.1697/2016 before the learned II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Karkala since 50% of the fine amount has already been deposited in terms of the Interim Order passed in Crl.A.No.47/2020 and Crl.R.P.No.1008/2022. The Petitioner has no objections to withdraw the amount in deposit by the Respondent/Complainant. Therefore, the Order of Conviction may kindly be modified, in the ends of justice." 2. Placing the memo on record, the revision petition stands disposed of. 3. It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the joint memo is not paid, the petitioner shall - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15793 CRL.RP No. 1008 of 2022 undergo imprisonment as ordered by learned Trial Magistrate and confirmed by learned judge of first appellate Court. Amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant on due identification. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25