Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35155 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.18 out of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.17640 of 2025.
4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.269 of 2023, under Section 363, 376AB, 307 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Khakhreru, District Fatehpur, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application, as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected.
6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 5, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Ram Naresh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad