- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16704 WP No. 6317 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6317 OF 2021 (LR) BETWEEN: ATHIR KUMAR HEGDE AGED 58 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMESH KUMAR HEGDE, R/AT NIDAMBALLI MOODU TONSE VILLAGE, KALYANPUR POST, UDUPI-576 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LAND TRIBUNAL REP. BY ITS SECRETARY UDUPI TALUK UDUPI-576 101. 2. THUKARAM HEGDE AGED 84 YEARS, S/O LATE ANTHAYYA HEGDE, R/AT MOODUTHONSE, NIDAMBALLY, POST KALLIANPUR, UDUPI-576 101. 3. RATHI B SHETTY AGED 71 YEARS, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16704 WP No. 6317 of 2021 D/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 4. MUDDANNA S SHETTY AGED 68 YEARS, S/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 5. PREMA R SHETTY AGED 56 YEARS, D/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 6. SHAKUNTHALA L SHETTY AGED 56 YEARS, D/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY, R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 7. PUSHPA P SHETTY AGED 54 YEARS, D/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY, R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 8. GEETHA S SHETTY AGED 52 YEARS, D/O LATE SARVOTHMA SHETTY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16704 WP No. 6317 of 2021 R/AT JANNI HOUSE, MUDUTHONSE VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576 105. 9. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU.V., HCGP FOR R1 & R9 SRI. S.PRAKASH SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R8 R2 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07/07/2015 BEARING PROCEEDINGS NO.LRY- 63-126-TRI-1983/76/77 PASSED BY THE R-1 LAND TRIBUNAL VIDE ANNX-A ON THE GROUND THAT THE SAME WAS NOT TOTALLY WITHOUT JURISDICTION BUT ALSO WAS EVIDENTLY PASSED ON THE BASIS OF A COMPROMISE PETITION ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE CLAIMANT SARVOTHAM SHETTY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 18.03.2026 along with copy of an agreement dated - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16704 WP No. 6317 of 2021 09.03.2026 entered into between the petitioner and respondents No.3 to 8 whereby the second party (contesting respondents) have agreed to execute a sale deed in favour of the petitioner immediately after the writ petition is withdrawn. Therefore, the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL