Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12598 (MAD)

CHANDRA v. The District Revenue officer

WP/11782/2026 · 2026-04-07

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 11782 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 11782 of 2026 1. Chandra W/o Balu, Therpettai Street, Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue officer Krishnagiri District 2.The Revenue Divisional officer Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District 4.Vengatesan S/o Rajan, Ekkur Village and Post, uthangarai Taluk, krishnagiri District Respondent(s) WP No. 11782 of 2026 PRAYER Directing the 3rd REspondent to subdivision of Patta in Pudhur (Ekkur) Village Survey No 74/ 5A based on the 1st respondent proceedings in the way of Pa.Mu. No 4613/ 2025 / LR. 2 dated 09.04.2025 in Patta No 47 to 1.87 acre to the petitioner WP No. 11782 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): M.Ravi For Respondent: Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11782 of 2026 Government Advocate for R1 to R3 R4 – notice dispensed with ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to issue subdivision patta in favour of the petitioner for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the proceedings of the first respondent dated 09.04.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fourth respondent, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 3. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11782 of 2026 5. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 26.03.2024, seeking for subdivision patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner based on the proceedings of the first respondent dated 09.04.2025 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the fourth respondent as well as any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 07-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Revenue officer Krishnagiri District 2.The Revenue Divisional officer Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11782 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 11782 of 2026 07-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis