Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010160272026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2597/2026 MD EACHIN ALI AHMED ALIAS EASIN ALI SO LATE ABDUR RASHID, RO VILL HELONARPAM, PO HOWLY, PS GOBARDHANA, DIST BAKSA, BTR, ASSAM, PIN 781316 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI, 110001 2:THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA ASHOKA ROAD NEW DELHI 110001 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GOVT OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY 6 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GHY 781007 5:THE STATE COORDINATOR OFFICE OF THE STATE COORDINATOR OF NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS NRC ASSAM 1ST FLOOR ACHYUT PLAZA Page No.# 2/3 GS ROAD BHANGAGARH GHY 781005 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BAJALI DIST BAJALI ASSAM 7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BORDER BAJALI DIST BAJALI ASSAM 8:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BAKSA DIST BAKSA BTAD MUSALPUR ASSAM PIN 781372 9:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BORDER BAKSA DIST BAKSA BTAD KATALIGAON ASSAM PIN 78137 Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, MR A S TAPADAR,MR. K M HASSAN,MR. A M ALAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 14-08-2026 (S.K Medhi, J) Heard Mr. K.M Hassan, learned counsel for the applicant, who by means of this application, has prayed for impleading the following Page No.# 3/3 incumbents as respondent Nos. 8 and 9: (District Commissioner, Baksa & Superintendent of Police (Border), Baksa). He has submitted that though the impugned opinion has been passed by the Foreigners Tribunal, Bajali, in which this Court had passed an order dated 27/07/2026 directing his appearance, he could learn on such appearance that the records have been transferred to the Office of the Superintendent of Police (Border), Baksa. Under those circumstances, the present application for impleadment has been made. Also heard Ms. A. Verma, the learned Standing Counsel, Home Department & NRC; Ms. M.M Kataky, learned CGC for the respondent No. 1, Shri. P. Sarma, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No. 6 and Shri. N. Kalita, learned Standing counsel, ECI for the respondent No. 2 who have not raise objection to the aforesaid prayer for impleadment. Considering the facts and circumstances, the present application stands allowed, and the incumbents mentioned above are impleaded as respondent Nos. 8 and 9. I.A (C) stands disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant