Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010150072026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3823/2026 M/S NECCON POWER AND INFRA LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KHETAN BHAWAN, SEUNI ALI, A.T. ROAD, JORHAT, ASSAM - 785001, CORPORATE OFFICE AT 416, 4TH FLOOR, CITY PLAZA, SPACE CINEMA COMPLEX, BANKI PARK, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN- 302016, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT HOUSE NO.37, NEECON HOUSE, TULSIBALA ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781005 AND IS DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SMT. PAYAL KHADRIA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA HAVING OFFICE AT KARTAVYA BHAWAN - 1, NEW DELHI-110001 2:BANK OF BARODA HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT BARODA HOUSE P.B. NO. 506 MANDVI VADODARA GUJARAT - 390001 INDIA AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT JORHAT BRANCH ASSAM TRUNK ROAD JORHAT ASSAM 785002 3:POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (NERPSIP) HAVING ITS NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE AT PUB-SURUJ NAGAR PATH NUTUN BAZAR Page No.# 2/3 ODALBAKRA KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 4:INDIAN BANK HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT PB NO 5555 254-260 AVVAI SHANMUGAM SALAI ROYAPETTAH CHENNAI - 600 014 AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT JORHAT BRANCH ASSAM TRUNK ROAD JORHAT ASSAM - 785001. 5:PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK HAVING ITS REGISTERED CORPORATE OFFICE AT PLOT NO. 4 SECTOR 10 DWARKA NEW DELHI - 110075 AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT CBB GUWAHATI BRANCH LIC BUILDING SS ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI ASSAM -781001 6:CANARA BANK HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 112 J.C. ROAD BENGALURU - 560 002 KARNATAKA INDIA AND ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT JORHAT BRANCH POST BOX NO 61 117/118 GARALI JORHAT - 785001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D DAS SR. ADV, MS C DAS,MR K TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, CANARA BANK,SC, INDIAN BANK,SC, PNB Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 05.08.2026 Mr. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. M. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, 4 & 6; Mr. N. Khera, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 [virtual mode] and Mr. A. Parvej, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 are present. Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of subsequent developments, the cause of action for which the writ petition was filed, is no longer in existence and therefore, the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that they have no objection in respect of the prayer for withdrawal, made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant