Bojedia Srinivasa Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/5034/2024 · 2026-09-29
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12588 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12588 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010077682024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 5034/2024 Between:
1. BOJEDIA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. B.SUUA RAO (LATE) HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.4-261, INDIRA COLONY, VELAGALERU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-521 229. 2. BOJEDIA NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. B.SUBBA RAO (LATE), HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-261, INDIRA COLONY, VELAGALERU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 229. 3. RAAVI PULLAIAH,, S/O. BHUSHAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/0.3-18A, MORUSUMELLI VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 230. 4. RAAVI VEERAIAH,, S/O. BHUSHSDAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O. 15-135, MORUSUMELLI VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 230. 5. RAAVI NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. SATYANARAYANA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5-19, MORUSUMELLI VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-521
230. 6. RAAVI KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O. SATYANARAYANA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.3-20, MORUSUMELLI VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-521
230. 7. RAAVI RAMARAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.2-98A, TURPU BAZAR, VINAGADAPA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-521 403. 2 SRK, J WP.No.5034 of 2024
8. RAAVI BHASKARA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-109, EAST BAZAR, VINAGADAPA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-521 403
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY,
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. REVENUE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE STATE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. THE STATE SHO, MYLAVARAM, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of y mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioners No.l to 8 from the lands i.e., from possession and enjoyment of the 1st petitioner of an extent of Ac.2.56 cents and 2nd petitioner of an extent of Ac.2.56 cents and 3rd petitioner of an extent of Ac.
0.46 cents and 4th petitioner of an extent of Ac.0.46 cents and 5th petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and 6th petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and 7th petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and 8th petitioner of Ac. 1.19 cents in Survey No.28/1 and 28/2 of Mulakalapanta Village of Morsumilli Grampanchayat of Mylavaram Mandal of Krishna District is illegal, arbitrary
3 SRK, J WP.No.5034 of 2024
and in violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that consequentially to prevent the respondents 2 to 8 and their subordinates not to interefere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner's 1 to 8 to cultivate the lands situated in Mulakala panta Village of Mylavaram Mandal in Survey No.28/1 and 28/2 i.e., in the possession of the 1st petitioner for an extent of Ac.2.56 cents, the possession of the 2nd petitioner for an extent of Ac.2.56 cents, the possession of the 3rd petitioner for an extent of Ac.0.46 cents, the possession of the 4th petitioner for an extent of Ac.0.46 cents, the possession of the 5th petitioner for an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents, the possession of the 6th petitioner for an extent of Ac 1.19 cents, the possession of the 7th petitioner is in possession for an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and the possession of the 8th petitioner for an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.2 to file Counter Affidavit in W.P.No.5034 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MODUGU VENU GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3.
GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following:
4 SRK, J WP.No.5034 of 2024
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“….to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in dispossessing the petitioners No.1 to 8 from the lands i.e., from possession and enjoyment of the 1st petitioner of an extent of Ac.2.56 cents and 2nd petitioner of an extent of Ac.2.56 cents and 3rd petitioner of an extent of Ac. 0.46 cents and 4th petitioner of an extent of Ac.0.46 cents and 5th petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and 6th petitioner of an extent of Ac.1.19 cents and 7th petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents and 8th petitioner of Ac. 1.19 cents in Survey No.28/1 and 28/2 of Mulakalapanta Village of Morsumilli Grampanchayat of Mylavaram Mandal of Krishna District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner and pass such other order…”
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the Interlocutory Applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Date: 30.09.2026. MS
5 SRK, J WP.No.5034 of 2024
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Writ Petition No:5034 of 2024 Date: 30.09.2026
MS