Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12585 (AP)

Chimata Sambasiva Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLA/380/2018 · 2026-10-09

Sunitha Gandham

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010031792018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] SATURDAY, THE 10th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 380/2018 Between: 1. CHIMATA SAMBASIVA RAO, R/O. TENNERU VILLAGE, KANIKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...APELLANT AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD 2. MOGULURI BHASKARA RAO, R/O. TENNERU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to file this Criminal Appeal against the Judgment of acquittal dated 09.11.2017 passed by the Learned XII Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in Sessions Case No. 66 of 2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file appeal against the Judgment in SC No. 66 of 2015 Dt. 09.11.2017 on the file of Honble XII Additional District Judge cum VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District 2 Counsel for the Apellant: 1. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA Counsel for the Respodent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. N PAVAN KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 380/2018 ORDER: 1. Ms. P. Naga Shireesha, learned counsel, representing Mr. Virupaksha Dattatreya Goud, learned counsel for the Appellant, submitted that they could not get any details in respect of the legal representatives of the defacto complainant who filed the instant appeal, feeling aggrieved by the judgment of acquittal dated 09.11.2017 in S.C. No. 66 of 2015 passed by the XII Additional District Judge-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, and requested to dismiss the appeal. 2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant. 3. In the result, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 10.10.2026 CJP 4 03 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 380/2018 Date: 10.10.2026 CJP 5