Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12583 (KAR)

M/S MAVINKERE ESTATE v. ARVIND J KOTECHA

WP/20024/2022 · 2026-02-16

Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9223 WP No. 20024 of 2022 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 20024 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M/S MAVINKERE ESTATE HAVING OFFICE AT ESTATE OFFICE KALASA, MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577124 A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY PRABHUDAS D KOTECHA (PARTNER) 2. PRABHUDAS D KOTECHA S/O DAMODAR KOTECHA AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS RESIDING AT ESTATE BUNGLAW MAVINKERE ESTATE KALASA POST MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 124. 3. RUPIN PRABHUDAS KOTECHA S/O PRABHUDAS D KOTECHA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS RESIDING AT ESTATE BUNGLAW MAVINKERE ESTATE KALASA POST, MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577124. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATE) HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9223 WP No. 20024 of 2022 - 2 - AND: 1. ARVIND J KOTECHA S/O JERAM KOTECHA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS MAVINKERE ESTATE KALASA POST MUDIGERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 124. 2. USHA J KOTECHA W/O LATE JAYENDRA KOTECHA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1903 ISCON PLATINUM SARDAR PATEL RING ROAD BOPAL CROSS ROADS BOPAL, AHMEDABAD GUJARAT-380 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.N. MANJUNATH PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE ORDER ON IA 15 PASSED BY HON’BLE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CVIL JUDGE ND CJM, CHIKKAMMAGALURU IN O.S 82/2020 DATED 30.07.2022 (ANNEXURE-A). THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9223 WP No. 20024 of 2022 - 3 - ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application stating that they do not wish to press this petition any further. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submit that the respondents had fled I.A.No.1/2025 seeking certain directions. He submits that since the petition is being withdrawn, he would request for direction to reserve liberty to take appropriate steps in pursuance of the application filed. 3. Accordingly the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications stand disposed of. 4. The respondents are granted liberty to take steps in respect of the application filed, albeit in accordance with the law. Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE SNB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA