Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12583 (JHR)

JITENDRA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1192/2026 · 2026-05-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:13934] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1192 of 2026 ------ Jitendra Prasad, aged about 42 years, son of Shri. Vishwanath Prasad, resident of Village- Dhendhe, P.O.- Hosir, P.S.- Gomia, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand-829111 … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Akchansh Kishore, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-08-05-2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.01.2026 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/- with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to Bonafide mistake of the advocate’s clerk, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.01.2026 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non- compliance of the said peremptory order dated 15.01.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3475 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-08.05.2026-Animesh/