Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12561 (ALL)

RAGHUVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

A227/13921/2026 · 2026-10-04

Vikram D Chauhan

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13921 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh as there are some inherent defects in the petition. 2. Sri Anil Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. If the petitioner file a petition, the petitioner shall be obliged to serve copy on Sri Anil Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 prior to filing of the petition. 5. Office is directed to return certified copies, if any, to learned counsel for the petitioner after keeping the photo copy of the same. October 5, 2026 VMA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Kumar Sharma, G.A., Kapil Kumar (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Raghuveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad