RADHARAMAN @ LALA S/O SHRI LAXMAN, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4136/2026 · 2026-04-07
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1256 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1256 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14294] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4136/2026 Radharaman @ Lala S/o Shri Laxman, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Bhanwarpura, Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.), Presently R/o Shikarganj, Police Station Kotwali, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.). (Presently Confined At District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.156/2025 registered at Police Station Karauli Sadar, District Karauli for offences under Section 308(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he extorted a motorcycle from the complainant. It is further submitted that the case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. As regards the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is submitted that five cases have been registered against him, out of which he has been acquitted in one case and has been enlarged on bail in the
[2026:RJ-JP:14294] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4136/2026] remaining four cases. The petitioner is behind the bars since 23.01.2026, and the charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Radharaman @ Lala S/o Shri Laxman, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/43