1 2026:CGHC:4374 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5981 of 2024 Namrata Patel W/o Hemshankar Patel, Aged About 35 Years R/o Salihabhata, Tahsil-Tamnar, District-Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Deputy Chief Engineer, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur Through Its Project Director/CGRP, IRCON International Limited, Chhattisgarh Rail Project, First Floor, North Avenue, Takhatpur Road, Uslapur, District- Bilapur (C.G.) (Govt. Of Indian Enterprise Under The Ministry Of Railways) 2 - Additional Collector, Raigarh And Competent Authority Under Rail Corridor Project, Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) And Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Competent Authority Under Land Acquisition, Gharghoda, Dsitrict-Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Kajal Chandra, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC For Respondents 2 & 3 : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 27.01.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- i. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 21/08/2023 passed by Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur in Railway Claim Case No.34A-82/2022-23. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.01.28 11:26:24 +0530 2 ii. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file petition/appeal before appropriate forum. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Petition. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same in the record. 7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini