1 / 2 2026:CGHC:213 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13925 of 2025 • Jayanti Rathore D/o Late Shri R P Rathore Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As The Lecturer (Chemistry), Government Higher Secondary School Seoni Naila, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh R/o Ward No. 17, Sant Ravi Das Chowk, Civil Lines, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. The Joint Director Education Division - Bilaspur, Division - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4. The District Education Officer District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 5. The Block Education Officer Block - Nawagarh, District - Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 6. The Principal Government Higher Secondary School, Sheoni Naila, Block - Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 7. Smt. Savita Rathore Lecturer Chemistry, Government Higher Secondary School, Sheoni Naila, Block - Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Advocate For Respondent-State For Respondents No. 1 to 6 : : Mr. Lav Sharma, Advocate Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabadhkar, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of consent give by Respondent No. 7 vide Annex. P-12 that she is intending to go to place of PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.01.03 16:25:37 +0530 2 / 2 posting of petitioner, and to cancel the order of posting of petitioner dated 07.06.2025 to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amapali, Block Jaijaipur, Dist. Sakti because mother of petitioner aged about 70 years had undergone open heart bypass surgery and it is petitioner who takes care of her mother, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to submit fresh representation before respondents No. 2 & 3 along with consent letter issued by Respondent No. 7 and the concerned authorities be directed to take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner, within specific time frame. 2. Submission made by learned counsel for petitioner is supported by the counsel for Respondent No.7. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking liberty to submit a representation before the concerned authorities, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit fresh representation before Respondents No. 2 & 3 raising all the grounds as raised in this petition and enclosing all relevant documents. In the event, petitioner submits such a representation, Respondents No. 2 & 3 shall take decision on the representation of petitioner in accordance with law, sympathetically in an objective manner, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE