Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1255 (KAR)

SRI RAMESH ALAVANDI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/7297/2024 · 2026-02-24

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12124 CRL.P No. 7297 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7297 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMESH ALAVANDI, S/O SRI. HALASIDDAPPA ALAVANDI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 2. SMT. GIRIJA HALASIDDAPPA ALAVANDI, W/O SRI. HALASIDDAPPA ALAVANDI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. SRI. RUDRESH, S/O SRI. HALASIDDAPPA ALAVANDI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.264/B, HALALAGERI ROAD, NISARGA LAYOUT, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, ISHWAR TEMPLE, GADAG - 562 102. 4. SMT. NANDA, W/O SRI. VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 5. SRI. VIJAY KUMAR, S/O SRI. SHIVALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS. 4 TO 5 ARE RESIDING PERMANENTLY AT CHANDRAMOULESHWARA LAYOUT, DODDABALLAPUR, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12124 CRL.P No. 7297 of 2024 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESH A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY VIDYARANYAPURA P.S., REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SMT. RANJANA R., W/O SRI. RAMESH ALAVANDI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, SHAKAMBARI 1ST CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. DILRAJ ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN C.C.NO.11419/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.11419/2021 (CR.NO.09/2021) AND CHARGE SHEET, FILED FOR AN OFFENCES P/U/S 498A OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT TO PASS ANY SUCH OTHER ORDER/S OR RELIEF/S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12124 CRL.P No. 7297 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are before this Court calling in question proceedings in C.C.No.11419/2021 pending before the VII A.C.M.M Bengaluru, for the offences under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Heard Sri.Rajesh A, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri.K.Nageshwarappa, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, Sri.Dilraj Rohit Sequeira, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record. 3. The parties to the lis were also before the Family Court in M.C.No.6566/2021 and have settled the dispute amongst themselves before the Family Court by terms of Memorandum of Settlement. One of the term of the settlement is, closure of the present proceedings. The said term in the settlement reads as follows: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12124 CRL.P No. 7297 of 2024 “… … … 6. The petitioner has agreed to cooperate to close/quash the C.C.No.11419/2021, arised out of Crime No.9/2021 of Vidyaranyapura Police Station, Bengaluru, under Section 498-A of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of D.P. Act, filed against the respondent and his family members, which is pending before VII ACMM, Bengaluru, in pursuance of this settlement/agreement. 7. In view of this settlement, the petitioner has agreed to withdraw Crl. Misc. No.128/2021 filed under Section 12 of D.V Act against the respondent herein and the same Is pending before MMTC-III, Bengaluru, without any further prosecution. 8. Both the parties hereby withdraw the allegations made against each other unconditionally, in view of this settlement. 9. Both the parties agree that they shall not interfere in any manner in the life of each other in future, and both parties are free and they are entitled to lead their life independently as per their choice without any objection, interference by either party. III. In view of the aforesaid settlement entered into between the parties, the parties pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dissolve the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on 16.12.2017 at Huligamma Devi Devasthana, Munirabad, Koppala Taluk and District and direct to cancel the marriage certificate registered on 16.12.2017 before the Registrar of Marriages, Gadag vide No.GDG-HM463- 2017-18, stored in C.D.No.GDGM22, in terms of the aforesaid agreement...” 4. Therefore, in light of the settlement arrived at between the parties quoted supra and offences not being against the State, I deem it appropriate to terminate the proceedings against the petitioners in the subject petition. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12124 CRL.P No. 7297 of 2024 5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following: ORDER i. Criminal Petition is disposed. ii. Proceedings in C.C.No.11419/2021 pending before the VII A.C.M.M Bengaluru, stands quashed qua the petitioners. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20