SHREERAM KANDRA v. CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED
WPS/2867/2026 · 2026-03-29
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12549 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12549 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 4
2026:CGHC:14723
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2867 of 2026 Shreeram Kandra S/o Santosh Kandra Aged About 35 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Engineer, Hasdeo Thermal Power Station, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Korba West, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Through The Managing Director, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan, Dangniya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through The Managing Director, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan, Dangniya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chairman Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Chairman Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - General Manager (Hr) Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Chief Engineer (Hr) Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG
2 / 4 7 - Chief Engineer (Hr) Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Additional Chief Engineer (Hr) Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan Dangniya, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 9 - Hasdeo Thermal Power Station Through The Chief Engineer/executive Director, Korba West, District- Korba (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 30.03.2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- ‘10.1That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to provide inter- company merger to the petitioner from Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited (CSPGCL), Korba West to Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited (CSPTCL), Raipur as per the procedure prescribed in Inter-Company merger circular dated 05.03.2019 (Annexure P-7). 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass such further orders or directions as
3 / 4 may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is working on the post of Assistant Engineer at Hasdeo Thermal Power Station, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Korba West, Chhattisgarh. Petitioner is entitled for inter-company merger from Hasdeo Thermal Power Station (HTPS), under Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited (CSPGCL), Korba to Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited (CSPTCL), Raipur and for which petitioner has already submitted representation before the Chief Engineer (Human Resource) according to the policy formulated in this regard. However, the representation submitted by petitioner on 29.07.2025 vide Annexure P-8 till date has not been considered and, therefore, direction be issued to respondent no. 6 to place an application for approval of competent authority i.e. respondent no. 1 to 4 to consider and take decision within the specified time frame.
3.
Learned counsel for respondents would submit that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner and he also submits that if the application has been submitted by petitioner , it will be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, nature of grievances raised and further considering the policy formulated by the respondents in this regard for submitting an application before the appropriate authority which petitioner has submitted before respondent no. 6, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, directing respondent no. 6 to forward the
4 / 4 claim of petitioner before respondent no. 1 to 4 within three weeks and if claim of petitioner is forwarded by respondent no. 6, concerned authority shall consider and decide the application forwarded, in accordance with law within a further period of ‘three months’ from the date of receipt of copy of such representation.
5. With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ petition stands dispose of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza