Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010144472026 2026:GAU-AS:11555 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1939/2026 ABDUL MINTU ALIAS MINTU ALI S/O- ABDUL RAHIM, R/O- CHAWALKHUWA GHORBANDI CHUK, P.S.- DIBRUGARH, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. MD IMDAD,MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR A H SARKAR(INFORMANT),G UDDIN(INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 14.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.J. Baruah, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for grant of regular bail to the accused-applicant, namely, Abdul Mintu @ Mintu Ali, in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 213/2026, under Sections 126(2)/296/74/75/115(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 25(IA) of Arms Act, 1959. 3. The allegations involved in this case is that on 02.07.2026, informant namely Jasmin Begum has lodged an FIR before the Officer-In- Charge of Dibrugarh P.S. alleging inter alia that on the previous evening, her son Ejaz Ahmed, daughter Shehnaz Begum, and relative Simran Hussain were intercepted, verbally abused, and physically assaulted by Mintu Ali (alias Abdul Mintu) and his associates. According to the complaint, the accused group threatened Ejaz Ahmed with a pistol to force the withdrawal of a prior case (Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 103/2026), caused him 'serious physical injury, and molested and attempted to rape the women present. Following the report, the police registered the case as Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 213/2026, under sections 126(2), 296, 74, 75, 115(2), 351(3), and 315 of the BNS 2023, along with section 25(1A) of the Arms Act. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a false case has been lodged against the petitioner as out of vendetta as there is a long history of enmity between the petitioner and informant side. 5. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in several cases by the members of the informant side and the present one is another such false case submits learned counsel. Page No.# 3/3 6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has furnished the injury reports. 7. The statements of the two of the witnesses, who are also members of the informant family. The injury reports do not indicate any previous injury as alleged. 8. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. 9. Therefore, it is directed that the above-named accused- applicant, in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 213/2026, under Sections 126(2)/296/74/75/115(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 25(IA) of Arms Act, 1959 shall be released forthwith from the judicial custody on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two local sureties of like nature, at least one of whom should be a Government servant, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Dibrugarh, subject to the following conditions: - (i) That the accused- applicant shall refrain from approaching the members of the informant’s family or try to humiliate them in any manner. 10. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant