Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12537 (GAU)

SRI KHAGEN KALITA v. THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/4253/2026 · 2026-08-11

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010165432026 2026:GAU-AS:11425 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4253/2026 SRI KHAGEN KALITA S/O SRI PRADIP KALITA, R/O VILL- KATASHBARI, P.O. NAYAGAON, P.S. JOGIGHOPA, DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM- 783372. VERSUS THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL, GAUHATI HIGH COURT, GUWAHATI -781001. 2:THE REGISTRAR (VIGILANCE) GAUHATI HIGH COURT GUWAHATI -781001 3:THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BONGAIGAON ASSAM 783380. 4:THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTC) NORTH SALMARA ABHAYAPURI ASSAM -783384 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Hoque, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. G. Baishya, Sr. Advocate Ms. D. Bora, Advocate Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 12.08.2026 Mr. S. Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there are formal defects in the instant writ petition and as such, the petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice. The learned counsel further submitted that liberty may also be granted to the petitioner to approach this Court again. 2. Taking into account the said submission, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 3. The withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice the petitioner and further the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court again. JUDGE Comparing Assistant