-1- 953-BA-1592-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1592 OF 2026 VICKY ALIAS ANIL POLAD MALI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ..... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Surendra V. Suryawanshi APP for Respondent - State : Mr. K. K. Naik Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Prafullasing H. Patil ..... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Advocate for applicant and learned APP. 2. Upon showing disinclination to allow the application, on instructions, the learned Advocate for applicant seeks withdrawal of the application, with liberty to file a fresh application after one year from the date of this order, in case there is no substantial progress in the trial. 3. Permission granted. 4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 5. In case substantial progress is not made in conducting the trial, the applicant can prefer a fresh application before the learned Trial Court after a period of one year. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR) JUDGE Tandale 2026:BHC-AUG:43919