Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12537 (ALL)

M/S S.R. ENGINEERING WORKS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/36025/2026 · 2026-09-30

Satya Veer Singh, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36025 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Pandey, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, there be direction upon respondent no. 5 to make payment of admitted amount of Rs. 10,65,172/- due for services rendered by him pursuant to different contracts and work orders. He also seeks interest. 2. Mr. Nitesh Patel, learned advocate holding the brief appears for respondent nos. 2 to 6 (the supply company/employer). He draws attention to paragraph 10 and submits, only 2 out of 4 bills have been disclosed by petitioner. Mr. Dilip Kumar Tiwari, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears for State. 3. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order to respondent no. 5, who is proper authority as submitted by Mr. Patel. Petitioner will enclose copies of all bills for perusal and consideration of said respondent. Within three weeks thereof there be action taken for sanction of payment and disbursement of the outstanding or good reason informed to petitioner for dispute the claim, or any part thereof. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. October 1, 2026 Jaswant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pandey, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udit Chandra (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) M/S S.R. Engineering Works .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad