Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12535 (JHR)

MAMTA DEVI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3646/2026 · 2026-05-15

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3646 of 2026 Mamta Devi, Wife of Sanoj Kumar Das … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP --- 03/15.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber-crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody and charge- sheet has already been submitted. He submits that as per allegation, one Mobile and One SIM card have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one victim has been identified. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail, but the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. He has submitted that the mobile and SIM card recovered from the petitioner are not in the name of the petitioner. 5. The learned counsel for the State also submits that there are several crime links, but only one victim could be identified. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees 2026:JHHC:15127 2 twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber- crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be her close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of her Aadhar Card along with her mobile number before the learned court which she will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:16.05.2026