Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12534 (BOM)

SUSMITA HARSH CHAPPALWAR. v. HARSH NARSINGRAO CHAPPALWAR.

CA/9682/2026 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

949 ca 9682-26 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9682 OF 2026 IN FCA/34/2026 SUSMITA HARSH CHAPPALWAR. VERSUS HARSH NARSINGRAO CHAPPALWAR. ... Mr. Dhakane R. B. h/f Mr. Jayewar Sainath Gangadhar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Balbhim R. Kedar, Advocate for sole Respondent …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 24/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard rival submissions. 2. The application is filed seeking withdrawal of the amount of Rs.4,50,000/- deposited by the respondent-husband towards arrears of maintenance payable for the daughter of the applicant, namely, Aradhya. Admittedly, pursuant to the direction of this Court, the respondent-husband has deposited the said amount of Rs.4,50,000/- before this Court. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-husband has no objection to the withdrawal of the said amount; however, he expressed his concern regarding the utilization of the amount. According to him, the said amount ought to be utilized only for meeting the needs of the daughter, Aradhya . VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:44072-DB 949 ca 9682-26 . 4. Admittedly, Aradhya is a minor girl and is not in a position to utilize the amount on her own. Considering the said fact, the applicant-wife is permitted to withdraw the said amount of Rs.4,50,000/-, along with the interest accrued thereon till date. It is made clear that the aforesaid amount shall be utilized towards the education and other necessary expenses of the daughter, Aradhya. The applicant-wife shall maintain a proper account of the expenditure incurred from the said amount. 5. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|2