Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010095782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2263/2026 SMTI JANAKI KOCH WIFE OF LATEDHANESWAR KOCH RESIDENT OFVILLAGE SAUKUCHI P.O.SAUKUCHI P.S. GARCHUK DISTRICT KAMRUPMETRO ASSAM PIN NO.781040 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI -781006. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DISTRICCOMMISSIONER DISTRICT KAMRUPM LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781036. 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPURREVENUE CIRCLE BELTOLA BASISTHA Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI KAMRUPMETRO ASSAM PIN NO.781028. 4:THE SHERISTADAR COURT OF THECIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISIONNO.1 KAMRUP METRO GUWATI ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR SAIFUL ISLAM Advocate for : SC REVENUE appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 17.08.2026 Heard Mr. D. Barman, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue and Disaster Management Department for the opposite party no. 1; and Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party nos. 2 & 3. 2. The applicant as the writ petitioner preferred the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 2839/2026. In the writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the composite land sale transfer application filed by the petitioner. 3. In this interlocutory application, it is averred that for the purpose of deciding the accompanying writ petition, presence of the following authority, that is, ‘Sheristadar, Court of Civil Judge [Senior Division] No. 1, Kamrup [Metro], Guwahati’ as party-respondent no. 4 is necessary. Page No.# 3/3 4. The learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have submitted that they have no objection if the interlocutory application seeking impleadment of the proposed authority as s party-respondent in the accompanying writ petition is allowed. 5. Having gone through the statements and averments made in the instant application, I am of the considered view that the presence of the afore-mentioned authority as the party- respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition appears necessary for adjudication of the issues involved therein. 6. Consequently, the instant interlocutory application seeking impleadment of the party- respondent no. 4 in the accompanying writ petition stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant