HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38737 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Ms. Daraksha Mariyam, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. P.K. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the act and conduct of the co-sharers of the property despite there being a partition decree passed by the Trial Court in proceedings drawn under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. In our considered view, the petitioner should get the decree executed in accordance with law. No mandamus can be issued to the Superintendent of Police or otherwise District Administration to interfere in a pure civil dispute between the parties. 4. Subject to aforesaid liberty, the petition is consigned to records. October 1, 2026 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daraksha Mariyam, Pavan Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Komila Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad