Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12529 (KAR)

SATHYANANDA v. D. K. VARTHAKARA VIVIDHODHESHA

WP/6618/2026 · 2026-03-02

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12456 WP NO.6618 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6618 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SATHYANANDA S/O NARAYANA DAS, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT SHRI LAKSHMI NIVAS, MURA, KABAKA POST, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA V.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D.K. VARTHAKARA VIVIDHODHESHA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITHA BANTWAL, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI. AJITH KUMAR JAIN, BANTWAL, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 219. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALURU - 575 001. 3. SHARATH KUMAR S/O RAGHUDAS AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.4-313, KUDOOR HOUSE, VITLA POST, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12456 WP NO.6618 OF 2026 BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 243. 4. SUBRAMANAYA PRASAD S/O RAGHUDAS AGE: MAJOR R/AT DOOR NO.4-313, KUDOOR HOUSE, VITLA POST, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 243. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31ST OCTOBER, 2025 PASSED ON IA NO.1 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN DISPUTE NO.JRM/DDS/178/2024-25, REJECTING THE SAID APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING TO TRANSFER THE PROCEEDINGS TO ANY OTHER FORUM HAVING COMPETENT JURISDICTION VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Yogesh D. Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12456 WP NO.6618 OF 2026 2. After arguing for some, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. 3. Accordingly, keeping open all the contentions of the parties, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25