[2026:RJ-JP:29982] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12475/2026 CNR: RJHC020577972026 | URN: CW / 27554U / 2026 1. Munnaram Saini S/o Shri Kesarlal Saini, Resident Of Patel Ki Dhani, Village Peepla Bharat Singh, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 2. Vinod Saini S/o Mangilal Saini, Resident Of Maliyoon Ki Dhani, Village Chimanpura, Bhankrota, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Rajendra Choudhary S/o Shri Gyarsilal Coudhary, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Jhai, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 2. Rajendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shambhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Bhambhoriya, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Sanganer, District Jaipur. 4. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 5. Smt. Urmila Saini W/o Shri Rajendra Saini, Resident Of Kartarpura, Jaipur. 6. Ms. Rashmi Saini D/o Late Puran Saini, Resident Of Kartarpura, Jaipur. 7. Shri Rajkumar Anandani S/o Late Sundarlal Anandani, Resident Of Plot No. 90, Bindayaka, Jagatpura Road, Income Tax Colony-I Tehsil And District Jaipur. 8. Shri Vinod Kevalani S/o Shri Narayan Das Kevalani, Resident Of Plot No. 4-B-4, Jawahar Nagar, Monli Marg, Sector-4, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Sogani, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order [2026:RJ-JP:29982] (2 of 3) [CW-12475/2026] 03/08/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by Board of Revenue, Ajmer (for short 'the Board of Revenue'), whereby ad interim stay order has been passed directing both the parties to maintain status quo, with regard to land in respect of spot as well as revenue record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 3. This Court finds that the writ petition is directed against ad interim order and the appeal filed by the private respondents against the petitioners as well as the stay application are still pending before the Board of Revenue. 4. Hence, this Court finds that any comments on merits at this stage may prejudice rights of both the parties in second appeal, which is pending before the Board of Revenue. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of interim order, the petitioners are suffering as the entire front side of the petitioners' land, which otherwise opens at main road, has been closed by erecting boundary wall. 6. Be that as it may, at the stage when even stay application is pending before the Board of Revenue, no mandatory directions to demolish the boundary wall, at this stage, can be given by this Court in this case. 7. Looking to the urgency of the petitioners, this Court, while not entertaining the writ petition on merits, deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with directions to the Board of Revenue to hear and decide appeal No.3102/2026/Jaipur [2026:RJ-JP:29982] (3 of 3) [CW-12475/2026] pending before it expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 8. Writ petition stands disposed of with above directions. 9. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 22/Jatin