Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12526 (GAU)

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS v. SRI BISAL DAS

I.A.(Civil)/2541/2026 · 2026-08-18

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010157052026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2541/2026 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI -6 2: THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI -22 3: THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES GENERAL ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI -2 VERSUS SRI BISAL DAS SON OF SRI PADMA NATH DAS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 107, SEWALI PATH, HATIGAON, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUPMETRO PIN71038, ASSAM 2:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GUWAHATI ELECTRICAL DIVISION CHANDMARI GUWAHATI - 03 .PROFORMA RESPONDEN Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R B GOSWAMI, MS. M D BORAH,MR. A SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D P BORAH, Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/6749/2025 SRI BISHAL DAS SON OF SRI PADMA NATH DAS RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 107 SEWALI PATH HATIGAON GUWAHATI - 781038 DISTRICT - KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM COOPERATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 2:THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 3:THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GUWAHATI ELECTRICAL DIVISION CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003 ------------ Advocate for : MR. D P BORAH Advocate for : SC CO OP appearing for STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 19/08/2026 Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present Interlocutory application. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1. Accordingly, the present Interlocutory Application stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant