Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12526 (ALL)

SMT NEHA @ ARPITA v. SHRI ANKIT TYAGI

FAPL/796/2024 · 2026-09-30

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL No. - 796 of 2024 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. Sri Abhishek Chandra, learned counsel for the appellant submits that no cause of action survives in the present appeal and same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Abhas Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent. October 1, 2026 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Abhishek Chandra, Rajesh Kumar Pal, Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt Neha @ Arpita .....Appellant(s) Shri Ankit Tyagi .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad