Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12522 (JHR)

NAZNEEN PARWEEN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2393/2026 · 2026-05-06

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:14768 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 2393 of 2026 ---- Nazneen Parween, aged about 31 years, D/o Siddique Ahmad, resident of Masjid Moholla, near Masjid Dhuthuwa, P.O &P.S Lari, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-825101 .......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, At- Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, having its office at Chaibagan Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Chaibagan, Gali, Kali Nagar, Namkum, P.O&P.S- Namkum, District Ranchi, Jharkhand .....Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sourav Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sonal Tiwary, AC to AG : Ms. Shreyashi Shekhar, Advocate : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate : Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate --- 02/ Dated: 06.05.2026 1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following relief(s):- i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction upon the respondents to immediately and forthwith appoint the Petitioner on the post of Graduate Trained Teacher for Classes XI-XII in the subject of Biology under EBC-1 category pursuant to the Post ( 2026:JHHC:14768 ) 2 Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination (Regular Recruitment) 2023, inasmuch as the Petitioner participated in the said examination and after being declared successful appeared in the document verification wherein no objection whatsoever was raised regarding her candidature, however her name has neither been included in the merit list nor in the rejection list despite the fact that vacancies are still lying vacant and the respondent authorities, without properly comparing the merit of eligible candidates as reflected in the recruitment examination, have arbitrarily restricted appointment to a limited number of candidates notwithstanding the availability of vacancies and qualified candidates including the present Petitioner. ii. ii. For a further direction upon the respondents that during the pendency of the instant writ petition, one seat in the subject of Biology under EBC-I category, in furtherance of Post Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination (Regular Recruitment) 2023, conducted under Advertisement No. 2/2023, be kept vacant / reserved for the present Petitioner, as seats under the said category are still vacant; 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of fact that few seats are vacant and twice the candidates were being called for document verification and the petitioner appeared in the first date of document verification; however, her name has neither been included in the merit list, nor in the rejection list, therefore, regarding this she has already represented the concerned respondent and accordingly, Ld. Counsel prays that respondent may look into this matter. 3. Mr. Piprawall, the learned counsel submits that since no counter- affidavit has been filed in this case, interest of justice would be sufficed if the petitioner approaches the respondent no. 6 who shall address the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 6 taking all the grounds as early as possible. ( 2026:JHHC:14768 ) 3 5. The moment, respondent no. 6 receives the representation, he shall take a decision in the matter as early as possible but not beyond a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. If at all any decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to her. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Abha/- 06.05.2026