HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 24069 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of the FIR in the writ petition. Learned AGA and Sri Lal Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. The relief for quashing of the FIR is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the petitioners recast their relief and pray that the petitioners may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking appropriate remedies available with them under law. The writ petition is dispose of with the observation that it is always open to the petitioners to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. October 1, 2026 I.A.Siddiqui Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Jitendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Shivam Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad