Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010147882026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2639/2026 In WP(C)/4410/2025 (D/O) THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE B SONITPUR, TEZPUR ASSAM VERSUS MD ABDUL RAHMAN S/O- LT. ABDUL HAMID R/O- VILL NO.1 MIRIPATHAR P.S CHARIDUAR DIST SONITPUR,ASSAM PIN 784101 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J PAYENG, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ECI, DY.S.G.I.,SC, NRC,MR. A AHMED BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 13.08.2026 (S. K. Medhi, J) Heard Shri G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Home and NRC Department for the applicant. Also heard Ms. B. M. Ahmed, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner. By the present application, the learned Standing Counsel has prayed for a correction in the judgment and order dated 20.11.2025 pertaining to the date of the impugned opinion rendered by the concerned Foreigners Tribunal, 7th, Page No.# 2/2 Tezpur. He has submitted that while the date of the impugned order has been correctly reflected in the first paragraph of the judgment as 27.03.2025, in the concluding part in paragraph 21, there appears to be an inadvertent mistake which has been written as 30.01.2020. He accordingly submits that the said mistake may be corrected. Ms. Ahmed, learned counsel for the opposite party has fairly submitted that she will not have any objection as the error appears to be an inadvertent one. Ms. S. Katakey, learned Standing Counsel, ECI; Shri P. Sarma, learned State Counsel and Ms. L. Devi, learned CGC are present. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials on record including the records of the connected WP(C)/4410/2025, it clearly appears that in paragraph 21 of the judgment, the date of the impugned opinion has been wrongly written as 30.01.2020 which should have been 27.03.2025. It is accordingly ordered that the date 30.01.2020 appearing in paragraph 21 of the judgment should be read as 27.03.2025. The IA accordingly stands allowed. Let this order be read as a part of the judgment dated 20.11.2025 passed in WP(C)/4410/2025. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant