Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12519 (KAR)

VIPIN @ BIPIN THIVARI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/12719/2025 · 2026-04-22

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22172 CRL.P No. 12719 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12719 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. VIPIN @ BIPIN THIVARI, S/O RAJKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O NO. 36, YALLAPPA STREET, CHIKKAMAVALLI, BENGALURU – 560 004. 2. RAJ KUMAR TIWARI, C/O HUBLAL TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT HARIPUR URF MISHRPUR, POST HARIPUR MARROW, HANDIA, ALLAHABAD, UTTAR PRADESH – 221 503. 3. MONU SINGH @ MONU SINGH, S/O SAMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT NO. 36, YALLAPPA STREET, CHIKKAMAVALLI, BENGALURU – 560 004. 4. AMITH SINGH @ SONU, S/O SAMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT POONAM NIVAS, 73, MOODALAPPA STREET, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22172 CRL.P No. 12719 of 2025 BENGALURU – 560 004. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY KALASIPALYA P.S., BENGALURU – 560 002. 2. PAVAN KUMAR SUKHLA, S/O AVADESH KUMAR SHUKLA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O NO.90/2, BAYAANAA QUARTERS, OPP. ARIHANTH MEDICAL, SUSHILA ROAD, CHIKKAMAVALLI, BENGALURU – 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SYED ISMAIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 528 BNSS PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.177/2025 IN KALASIPALYA P.S ANNEXURE A AGAINST THE PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 FOR THE O/P/U/S 109, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) OF BNS 2023, PENDING ON THE COURT OF 5TH ACMM COURT, BANGALORE CITY, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22172 CRL.P No. 12719 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the Criminal Petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that the charge sheet has been filed by the I.O the petition has become infructuous in this regard petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the petition. Wherefore this Hon'ble court may be pleased to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file fresh in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the Criminal Petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 102