Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12519 (ALL)

SUNEEL KUMAR v. SRI SATISH KUMAR, TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL ATRAULI

CAPL/7057/2026 · 2026-10-06

Piyush Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7057 of 2026 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s). Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submits that this is the first contempt application for willful disobedience of the writ Court's order dated 04.04.2024 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 715 of 2024, in which the following directions were issued: "4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of." On the strength of paragraph no.5 aforesaid order, learned counsel for the applicant submits that after passing of the order dated 04.04.2024, an application under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, was filed but till date the proceeding is still pending, therefore, the contempt is made out. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, this Court finds that no case for contempt is made out. The present contempt application is accordingly dismissed. October 7, 2026 Abhishek Gupta Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Lakhan Deobanshi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Suneel Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Satish Kumar, Tehsildar, Tehsil Atrauli .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad