1 2026:CGHC:19465 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5978 of 2022 * - Manoj Kumar Diwakar S/o Shri Kirtan Lal Diwakar Aged About 40 Years Working As Society Manager At Branch Dharsiwa District Raipur Chhattisgarh, R/o House No. 376, Barpara, Ward No. 10, Village And Post Kataud, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Co- Operative Society, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 – Registrar, Co- Operative Society Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Registrar Sahkari Sansthayan Division Raipur, G.E. Road Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents No. 1 to 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set-aside impugned order dated 15.07.2022 (Annexure P- 1) passed by the President Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Tribunal Bilaspur Camp Court Raipur in appeal case no. 20/2022 which is arising out of order dated 06.01.2022 Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.28 10:50:12 +0530 2 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Registrar Sahkari Society Raipur Chhattisgarh in the interest of justice. 10.(ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue strictly direction to the concerned respondent authorities to grant the claim of the petitioner i.e. benefit of service for regularization and seniority, increment and pay scale on completion of probation period of 2 years of service i.e. 12.05.2011 within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.(iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. The matter is called twice, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the first round as well as in the second round. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti