Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12515 (ALL)

SHAHID HUSSAIN @ CHAND v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLR/1172/2018 · 2026-10-04

Lakshmi Kant Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1172 of 2018 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. Learned counsel for revisionist in connected matter submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the criminal revision with liberty to file application under section 127 Cr.P.C. before trial court alleging the changed scenario after passing of impugned order. 2. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for revisionist in leading matter has no objection to the aforesaid innocuous prayer. 3. Learned counsel for revisionist in the leading matter further submitted that, if the learned counsel for wife-revisionist is withdrawing his criminal revision, he also does not press the present criminal revision. Considering that the beneficiaries of the case are wife and child of the revisionist and the revisionist has pious responsibility to maintain them. 4. Learned AGA has also no objection the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for parties. 5. In view of above, both the criminal revisions are liable to be dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Accordingly, both the criminal revisions are dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. The amount deposited by the revisionist in the leading matter be released in favour of wife-revisionist in the connected matter Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sharique Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Qazi Vakil Ahmad Shahid Hussain @ Chand .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) within a period of ten days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) October 5, 2026 Arti CRLR No. 1172 of 2018 2 Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad