Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12511 (BOM)

AJITKUMAR PATILSAHEB DENGALE v. BHAGWAT CHANDRBHAN DHOKCHOULE AND ORS

CA/11017/2026 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 920-CA.11017-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11017 OF 2026 IN WP/6474/2026 AJITKUMAR PATILSAHEB DENGALE VERSUS BHAGWAT CHANDRBHAN DHOKCHOULE AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chormal Ajit B. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. K. S. Patil. ... CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 24.09.2026 PER COURT :- 1. Writ Petition filed by the applicant was dismissed for want of prosecution due to failure to supply spare copies for issuance of notice within the stipulated period vide order dated 27.07.2026. There is a delay of 38 days in filing the present application. 2. The applicant has stated that, due to failure of applicant, he could not take note of the order passed by this Court and consequently, could not comply with the conditional order passed by this Court within the stipulated period. According to him, non-compliance is neither deliberate nor intentional. 2026:BHC-AUG:44099 2 920-CA.11017-26.odt 3. In view of the statement made in the application, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “B and C”. (MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.) ... vmk/-