Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12506 (BOM)

DNYANESHWAR SHIVAJI PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT AND OTHERS

CA/11620/2025 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 901wp11599.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO. 11599 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11620 OF 2025 IN WP/11599/2025 VISHNU NIVRUTTI KOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DISTRICT AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D. R. Kale AGP for Respondents/State : Dr. Kalpana Patil Bharaswadkar Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr.Kokade Amol Ashok ... CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 23.09.2026. PER COURT : 1. This matter is circulated by the respondent. According to the respondent No. 3, the order of disqualification for the post of Sarpanch is the subject matter of challenge in the present Writ Petition. But considering the term of office of the Grampanchyat itself is over on 10.02.2026. Therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition and this position is not disputed by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 2. In view thereof, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. 3. In view of disposal of the Writ Petition the pending all Civil Applications, if any, are also disposed of. ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ) mahajansb/