1 / 2 2026:CGHC:11319 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2303 of 2026 • Dr. Kusum Singh Paraste S/o Late Shobhit Singh Paraste Aged About 63 Years Retired Head Master And Resident Of House No. 73,bandh Para Road, Mani Surajpur, District- Surajpur Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction Third Floor Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Byron Bazar Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgar 4. Divisional Joint Director Office Of Divisional Joint Director Education Division Sarguja Ambikapur Chhattisgarh 5. Collector Surajpur District- Surajpur (C.G.) 6. District Education Officer Surajpur District- Surajpur (C.G.) 7. Block Education Officer Block- Ramanujnagar District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 10/03/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to consider and recalculate claim of the petitioner again and to release all amount including upgraded pay scale and other all retiral dues along with increased pension on the basis of policy of the State Govt. with 18% interest as early as possible, in the interest of justice. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was not granted second time pay scale prior to retirement of petitioner and thereby calculation of payment of retiral dues is also affected and less amount is paid to him. 3. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has not approached the authority pointing out the error of not granting the second time pay scale if petitioner is entitled for. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner may be permitted to submit fresh comprehensive representation before Respondents No. 3, 6 & 7 and direction be issued to the concerned authority to take decision on the representation at the earliest within specified time. 5. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, without observing anything on merit of the case, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation before Respondents No. 3, 6 & 7 and in the event petitioner submits such a representation the concerned authority shall consider and taken decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of representation. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE