HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23322 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that the petitioners have been arrested and sent to jail, therefore, the relief prayed in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 5, 2026 Prajapati RK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Maurya, Radhey Shyam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Himanshu Yadav @ Himanshu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad