HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35045 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.15 out of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Saurabh Pandey, learned counsel for applicant, Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9667 of 2025. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.0479/2024, under Sections 85, 103(1) B.N.S. & Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Sahjanwa, District- Gorakhpur, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application, as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 5, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjay Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad