Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1249 (GUJ)

RADHIKKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI DHAMELIYA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/13168/2026 · 2026-06-12

Ilesh J Vora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/13168/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 13168 of 2026 ========================================================== RADHIKKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI DHAMELIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR. RAAJEN D JADHAV(10026) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR RONAK RAVAL APP for the Respondent No. 1 MR ANIRUDH SUCHAK for original complainant ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 12/06/2026 ORAL ORDER ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent State. 2. The applicant, by way of this successive bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11201001250017 of 2025 registered with CID Crime Gandhinagar Police Station, Dist. Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 61, 316(3), 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) (as per FIR / 316(5) (as per chargesheet). 3. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that he is suffering confinement since 16.03.2026. He further submitted that the applicant R/CR.MA/13168/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026 has not played any vital role in the alleged offence. Hence, further detention of the applicant is unwarranted. 4. Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that, considering the conduct of the applicant and nature of accusation, the discretion may not be exercised in favour of the applicant. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and upon perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that, during investigation Rs.10 lakhs being paid by the applicant to the complainant. The prosecution case is based on documentary evidence and investigation on the aspect of forgery etc already been over. The co-accused Daksh Goswami has been granted bail by the coordinate bench of this Court. The prosecution failed to demonstrate further custody of the applicant is necessary. In such circumstances, when chargesheet is filed and trial would take considerable time, keeping behind the applicant behind bar, would not serve any purpose. Hence, the bail application is allowed. 6. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. R/CR.MA/13168/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026 No. 11201001250017 of 2025 registered with CID Crime Gandhinagar Police Station, Dist. Gandhinagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands only), with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall: No. Conditions (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; (d) not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; (e) furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court; 7. The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The bail R/CR.MA/13168/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026 bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove, shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted. (ILESH J. VORA,J) P.S. JOSHI Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/06/2026 16:58:25